Forgive me if you’ve already seen this. Just had to share.
Another tip: Always include the word “broken”!
Forgive me if you’ve already seen this. Just had to share.
Another tip: Always include the word “broken”!
If there’s one band out there I greatly enjoy, it’s Third Day. And for full disclosure’s sake, we do several of their songs as congregationals at Grace Life Church, including “Your Love Oh Lord” and “Children Of God”. However, I was a bit disappointed the other day when I heard this particular song on the radio. It seems to be another in a long line of songs that just don’t say enough. Much of that has to do with trying to be marketable to wider audiences. But I wonder how much of it has to do with being ashamed of the gospel?
Here are the lyrics (you can listen to the song on YouTube here).
Well, late one night, she started to cry and thought he ain’t coming home
She was tired of the lies, tired of the fight, but she didn’t want to see him go
She fell on her knees and said, “I haven’t prayed since I was young
But Lord above I need a miracle”
(Chorus)
Well no matter who you are and no matter what you’ve done
There will come a time when you can’t make it on your own
And in your hour of desperation
Know you’re not the only one, praying
Lord above, I need a miracle
I need a miracle
He lost his job and all he had in the fall of ’09
Now he feared the worst, that he would lose his children and his wife
So he drove down deep into the woods and thought he’d end it all
And prayed, “Lord above, I need a miracle”
He turned on the radio to hear a song for the last time
He didn’t know what he was looking for even what he’d find
The song he heard gave him hope and strength to carry on
And on that night, they found a miracle
They found a miracle
In your hour of desperation
Know you’re not the only one, praying
Lord above, I need a miracle
I need a miracle
Several questions I have about this song:
*Are they endorsing the fact that having this life’s problems is the main problem?
*How are they defining this miracle? Is it God drawing a soul into seeing the depth of their sin?
*Where is the preaching of the gospel in this equation?
*Does the songwriter understand the difference between God-wrought conviction and felt needs?
*Are they trying to say that the girl in the first verse is a born-again believer (even though she hadn’t “prayed since she was young”)?
*Could the song not have better clarity with the characters as to their lostness?
*I totally agree with the song in that God uses trials and hardships to get our attention but what is the miracle that the characters in the song found?
*How many of these problems listed in the song were self-inflicted? The bible deals much more with change of behavior to see situations improve than it does supernatural intervention (especially if these characters are believers).
*Does this song just cater to a victim’s mentality?
I totally understand that people going through great trials calls for empathy from the Church. However, overlooking an individual’s contribution to those trials is not being true to the Bible. Believers should be holding one hand out to be held by the suffering individual while in the other hand presenting God’s solutions to them from His Word. Having heart-felt emotions for those in dire circumstances and even doing service ministry to those in need is only a part of the healing. Being reconciled to God through the gospel is the foundation for all healing.
All I ask is that Christian bands and songwriters be very specific even though the demands for artistic aesthetics are at play. When writing songs that are expressly Christian, including a ministry element, then art is created for God’s sake and not art’s sake. Fidelity to the revealed will of God as found in the holy scriptures is paramount paling in comparison to iTunes sales.
Brother Music Minister, I believe that this song is way too ambiguous to use in a church service. I will keep listening to Third Day but will have to skip over this song.
I touched on this issue in passing in this past Tuesday’s radio interview with Monk Boone and I thought it worth the time to unpack a bit more. As pastors and music ministers, we are constantly looking for new songs to integrate into corporate worship. Right now, I’m teaching three new songs to the Praise Team and when our Choir returns in a few days, I’ll begin teaching three or four new ones to them. Currently, our Approved Song List has approximately 200 songs on it and have carefully been (and are still continuously being) tested against the veracity of scripture as to their acceptance on that list.
It’s hard enough to know enough of the bible to discern a song’s lyrical condition. It’s one thing to write a song that is artistic. It’s another thing to write a song that is artistic and biblical. But another question that I see come up quite frequently is the spiritual condition of the song-writer. With Ray Boltz’s admission of being a homosexual a few years ago this subject moved even more to the forefront.
Here’s the thing to keep in mind—lyrics are objective. We can clearly evaluate how accurate or inaccurate they are. A songwriter’s spiritual condition is not objective. “For who among men knows the thoughts of a man except the spirit of the man which is in him?” (1 Cor. 2:11) There’s no way to absolutely know if someone else is truly regenerate. We certainly have tests of saving faith given in God’s Word (especially in James, 1 John, and Jude) but nowhere are we to declare someone born-again. Even when dismissing someone from church membership, Jesus did not say “declare them a publican and tax-collector” (which, in historical context, was pagan) but “treat them AS a publican and tax-collector” (Matt 18:15-18). Scripture writer’s designation of folks being born-again (or terms in that vein) were almost always on a corporate level, not usually on an individual one.
What am I then saying? I’m advising any pastor or music minister who is responsible for selecting a church’s repertoire to evaluate a song primarily on the biblical accuracy of the lyrics. Then evaluate the song on the cultural appropriateness (if it’s stylistically distracting for a congregation, it probably shouldn’t be used). If I had to worry about whether or not every hymn-writer of history or every current songwriter is truly regenerate, we wouldn’t be singing any songs—including the ones I’ve written!
Is there ever a time when we should avoid using a song—even though it’s lyrics are biblical—because of the songwriter’s spiritual condition? Yes. If, as in the aforementioned Boltz case, the news of the songwriter’s bold rejection of the bible is so well-known among your congregation as to cause congregants to stumble (Romans 14) then I abstain. It makes no sense to force a congregation to sing a song while distracted by the open godless testimony of the songwriter and his association with that song.
However, those occasions are few and far between. You can, I would say 99% of the time, be rest assured that this will not be the case in selecting songs for congregational singing. To give an example, how many folks in your church even know that Robert Robinson actually turned from the faith for many years, even bordering on being a Universalist, before finally repenting and returning to orthodoxy late in life? Every time you sing “Come Thou Fount” you are singing his work. I’m not about to stop singing that song simply because Robinson had his major spiritual struggles. What about William Cowper? He attempted suicide three times! Should I stop singing “There Is A Fountain” because of that?! God forbid!
With all of that being said, I wish more folks would just care that their song lyrics are biblically accurate….(sigh)
Here’s this week’s version of Tuesdays With Tom and Monk on WSTS 100.9 FM. Today I share my humble top 5 contemporary hymns that should be sung by every church congregation. However, the first few minutes are dedicated to Monk picking on my request for a theme song and minor surgery I had on my big toe yesterday. It’s about 5 minutes none of us will ever get back.
I don’t consider myself a songwriter. I do write songs but a “songwriter” is someone who is known for it. I’m certainly not known for the songs I’ve written! A cyber-friend (did I just make up a new term???) of mine, Bobby Gilles, has posted an extremely beneficial post concerning lyric devices that any and all who write songs should feast upon. Bobby and his wife Kristin are a part of the Sojourn Community Church music ministry in the Louisville, KY area. He has been kind to direct others to my blog in the past but that’s not why I’m featuring him in this post. It would be well-worth your time to subscribe to his blog, “My Song In The Night” whether he had promoted this site or not!
I will give you the first few examples here and you can click here for the entire list:
Alliteration: the repetition of consonant sounds at the beginning of a word, like the “H” sound in “Hark the herald angels sing” or the “L” in Stephen Foster’s “Open thy lattice, love, listen to me.” Count all the alliteration in this brief part of Bob Dylan’s “Chimes Of Freedom” (look for B, F, D,S and M words):
Far between sundown’s finish and midnight’s broken toll
We ducked inside the doorway, thunder crashin’
As majestic bells of bolts struck shadows in the sun
Seeming to be the chimes of freedom flashing
Anadiplosis: Repeating the last word or phrase of one line at the beginning of the next one:
suffering produces endurance,
and endurance produces character,
and character produces hope,
and hope does not put us to shame,
– Romans 5:3-5Poor man wanna be rich
Rich man wanna be king
And a king ain’t satisfied
Till he rules everything
– “Badlands,” Bruce Springsteen
Anaphora: Repetition of the same words at the beginning of successive lines. Martin Luther King, Jr. used anaphora repeatedly in his “I Have A Dream” speech. Fanny Crosby begins “Redeemed, How I Love To Proclaim It” with three successive lines starting with the word “Redeemed.” And Charles Wesley uses anaphora well in “Come, Thou Long Expected Jesus“: “Born Thy people to deliver/ Born a child and yet a King/ Born to reign in us forever.” Look at the way Bill and Gloria Gaither repeat the title song phrase of “Because He lives” in their chorus:
Because He lives I can face tomorrow
Because He lives, all fear is gone
Because I Know He holds the future
This life is worth the living, just because He lives
Antimetabole: A figure of speech in which the same phrase or idea is repeated in transposed order, giving the second phrase a different or deeper meaning:
Antistrophe: Similar to antimetabole, but more limited in scope. Antistrophe occurs when words are repeated in reverse order, meaning essentially the same thing each time:
Antithesis: The use of opposites in successive phrases, to highlight the distinction or difference:
Click here to read the entire post
Here’s the latest Grace Life Music video. It is a setting of a William Cowper hymn and I took the AZMON melody and set them to it (also known as the melody to “O For A Thousand Tongues”). I also added an original little refrain. Here are the lyrics:
No strength of nature can suffice to serve the Lord aright
And what she has she misapplies for want of clearer light
Now long beneath the Law I lay in bondage and distress!
I toiled the precept to obey but toiled without success
The law it cannot save
Its works will not atone
It only teaches me
I’m saved by Christ alone
Then, to abstain from outward sin was more than I could do
Now if I feel its power within I feel I hate it too
Then all my servile works were done A righteousness to raise
Now freely chosen in the Son I freely choose His ways
“What shall I do?” was then the word “That I may deeper grow
What shall I render to the Lord?” is my inquiry now
To see the Law by Christ fulfilled and hear His pardoning Voice
A slave to change into a child and duty into choice
(C) 2011 GraceAnne Music
Here is the video:
Most of the time, it’s rather easy to know not to mess with a wolf. But if a wolf shows up clothed as a sheep, it may take a bit more wisdom and knowledge to protect oneself. In this day and age as a follower of Christ it’s rather easy to know not to pay attention to the satanic bible and to avoid hanging out at strip clubs. However, when a song is played on Christian radio it can be much more deceptive as to whether or not to embrace what a song’s lyrics are saying.
Such is the case with today’s example of a song. To be honest, I’m going to try my best to treat it with love and humility (how do we ever know if we are really doing THAT?) I’m sure that the artist (Mikeschair) has good intentions and is hopefully a true follower of Jesus. That does not excuse unbiblical lyrics. Here they are:
You might be the wife, waiting up at night
You might be the man, struggling to provide
Feeling like it’s hopeless
Maybe you’re the son, who chose a broken road
Maybe you’re the girl, thinking you’ll end up alone
Praying God can you hear me?
Oh God are you listening?
Am I more than flesh and bone?
Am I really something beautiful?
Yeah I wanna believe, I wanna believe that
I’m not just some wandering soul
That you don’t see and you don’t know
Yeah I wanna believe, Jesus help me believe that I
Am someone worth dying for
I know you’ve heard the truth that God has set you free
But you think you’re the one that grace could never reach
So you just keep asking, oh what everybody’s asking
Am I more than flesh and bone?
Am I really something beautiful?
Yeah I wanna believe, I wanna believe that
I’m not just some wandering soul
That you don’t see and you don’t know
Yeah I wanna believe, Jesus help me believe that I
Am someone worth dying for?
You’re worth it, you can’t earn it
yeah the cross has proven
That you’re sacred and blameless
Your life has purpose
You are more than flesh and bone
Can’t you see you’re something beautiful
Yeah you gotta believe, you gotta believe
He wants you to see, He wants you to see
That you’re not just some wandering soul
That can’t be seen and can’t be known
Yeah you gotta believe, you gotta believe that you
Are someone worth dying for
You can hear and watch the song here
.
I like how the song reaches out to everyone. Jesus certainly did that (Matt. 11:28). His gospel call is for anyone who will come (and we know that if one comes it is God Who caused them to come (John 6:44)— an antinomy). But this song also says something else. It supposes that Christ went to the cross because you and I had inherent worth and value. When did Jesus ever say that?
In fact, the scriptures say the opposite. It says that we are enemies and hostile towards God (Romans 8:7). It says that Jesus came not to do His own will but the Father’s (John 5:30; 6:40). The cross proves that we were without worth (Isaiah 64:6) and needed someone of infinite worth to be our substitute. It does nothing to prove that we had any worth (Phil. 3:8);. If we had inherent worth, we could redeem ourselves. We wouldn’t need Jesus. God forbid!
The point of the gospel is to display God’s great love to people who were the most unlikely objects of grace. If a sermon or a song appeals to the listener to look within and find worth then it minimizes the cross and the matchless worth and beauty of God’s Savior.
I challenge anyone to find a scene in the scriptures where Jesus interacted with an individual and showed them their need for a Savior by building up their own value and worth. You won’t be able to find it. If you can, I stand corrected. In fact, He shows us our need for a Savior by illuminating our sinfulness and lack of any worth—not because He likes to beat us down but because it is the truth—and then points us to His saving work by which we become objects of grace (rather than objects of wrath).
The truth is, my main problem before I was born-again was that I thought I had LOTS of worth. I loved myself to the point of hating everyone else. I’m so grateful that the gospel worked mightily in me and Jesus showed me that the only value I had was an infinite account of debt towards a holy God Who was standing ready to make me pay forever and ever in eternal punishment. He then enabled me to repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and I now have lost my life and value in Him!
On another note, this song doesn’t seem to be reaching out to the lost. It seems to be speaking more to folks who have professed Jesus, have failed God, and don’t see how God could forgive them (who doesn’t identify with that?) So you may say “You’re talking apples and oranges”. No I’m not. The Apostle Paul would say from Galatians that if we were saved by no merit of our own, why would we look to our own merit to continue in our walk with Jesus? (Gal. 3:3) If you are a professing believer, your source of victory is to continue to look to the limitless love and grace of Jesus and not your own value. Our worth is found in the Alpha and Omega not in our first and last name.
This song is correct in that it says that we “can’t earn it”. Amen! It is correct in saying that we are “sacred and blameless”. Absolutely. But it is only through Jesus and His merit. We will never find a place of rest by looking to ourselves. We must always and forever focus on Christ to find hope and to know that God truly is listening (Heb. 12:2). This song seems to de-value God’s Champion. I don’t believe, from the overwhelming evidence of scripture, that He would like that.
Brother Music Minister, please know your bible and please don’t use this song in your church.
Here’s a rough (emphasis on “rough”) mix of a song I wrote a while back. My friend Nathan Clark George allowed me to step into his home studio and recorded me playing and singing the song “It Had To Be You” (no–not the jazz song). You can see an old video of it here (man, am I skinny in it!) You can find FREE sheet music to it here.
Here are the lyrics:
The power of my will
Commitment in my zeal
Trusting in my strength and concentration
With no success to find
Still a pris’ner in my mind
Behind iron bars of my own condemnation
Failed on ev’ry count
And hope in no amount
It had to be You
Who captured my heart
‘Cause there was nothing in my soul that ever loved You
You showed me Yourself
And my need for Your blood
And how there was never any good in me
And Your complete ability
To make me anew
It had to be You
The war’s still there today
My Father to obey
But now it’s by His sacrifice I’m measured
His Spirit lives in me
His law a treasury
And fellowship with Christ my greatest pleasure
My slate not only clean
But broken on the tree
HERE’S THE AUDIO OF THE SONG:
And will the Judge descend and must the dead arise
And not a single soul escape His all discerning Eyes?
And from His righteous lips shall this dread sentence sound
And through the numerous guilty throng spread black despair around:
“Depart from Me, accursed, to everlasting flame
For rebel angels first prepared, where mercy never came”
How will my heart endure the terrors of that day
When earth and Heav’n before His Face astonished flee away?
But ere that trumpet shakes the mansions of the dead
Hark from the Gospel’s cheering sound what joyful tidings spread:
Ye sinners, seek His grace, Whose wrath ye cannot bear
Flee to the shelter of His cross and find salvation there
In my last entry I wanted to focus on Watts’ application of the aforementioned principles in hymns that are more commonly known. Today, I wish to share two more that are lesser known but more clearly show his methods. The first one comes from a hymn based upon the first two verses of the 32nd Psalm. The scripture text is as follows:
How blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven,
Whose sin is covered!
How blessed is the man to whom the LORD does not impute iniquity,
And in whose spirit there is no deceit!
Now here is Watts’ lyrics based upon this text:
Blessed is the man, forever blessed
Whose guilt is pardoned by his God
Whose sins with sorrow are confessed
And covered with his Savior’s blood
Blessed is the man to whom the Lord
Imputes not his inquities
He pleads no merit of reward
And not on works, but grace relies
From guile his heart and lips are free
His humble joy, his holy fear
With deep repentance well agree
And join to prove his faith sincere
How glorious is that righteousness
That hides and cancels all his sins
While a bright evidence of grace
Through his whole life appears and shines!
Notice the expansion Watts makes on what the Psalmist means by saying “whose sin is covered”—covered by Jesus’ blood. Also, Watts expounds as well on imputation. You can see that Watts does what any faithful expositor would do with this Psalms text. He is merely preaching in prose!
Another hymn that I think makes a great study is Watts’ work with the 26th Psalm. Here is the text:
Vindicate me, O LORD, for I have walked in my integrity,
And I have trusted in the LORD without wavering.
Examine me, O LORD, and try me;
Test my mind and my heart.
For Your lovingkindness is before my eyes,
And I have walked in Your truth.
I do not sit with deceitful men,
Nor will I go with pretenders.
I hate the assembly of evildoers,
And I will not sit with the wicked.
I shall wash my hands in innocence,
And I will go about Your altar, O LORD,
That I may proclaim with the voice of thanksgiving
And declare all Your wonders.
O LORD, I love the habitation of Your house
And the place where Your glory dwells.
Do not take my soul away along with sinners,
Nor my life with men of bloodshed,
In whose hands is a wicked scheme,
And whose right hand is full of bribes.
But as for me, I shall walk in my integrity;
Redeem me, and be gracious to me.
My foot stands on a level place;
In the congregations I shall bless the LORD.
From the Old Covenant perspective in reading this text, it would seem casually that the Psalmist sees himself justified within himself. Of course, we know that not to be the case for two reasons: (1) the gospel had not yet been fulfilled and the Psalmist is forward-looking, and (2) there is a prophetic element in that this is Christ Himself speaking and would not apply to us.
However, Watts takes this text and gives us the following prose. Notice the self-examination and a looking to the finished meritorious work of Jesus in its lines!:
Judge me, O LORD, and prove my ways
And try my reins, and try my heart
My faith upon Thy promise stays
Nor from Thy law my feet depart
I hate to walk, I hate to sit,
With men of vanity and lies
The scoffer and the hypocrite
Are the abhorrence of mine eyes
Amongst Thy saints will I appear
With hands well washed in innocence
But when I stand before Thy bar
The blood of Christ is my defence
I love Thy habitation, Lord
The temple where Thine honors dwell
There shall I hear Thine holy word
And there Thy works of wonder tell
Let not my soul be joined at last
With men of treachery and blood
Since I my days on earth have passed
Among the saints and near my God
affections Anchored In Truth Bob Kauflin Christian Radio church music church planting endorsements Grace Life Grace Life Music musicianship music styles nouthetics quotes Radio Show series sheet music Shoals Christmas Praise song lyrics songwriting special events staff relations theology True Church Conference Uncategorized video videos You tube video
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.





